The Living Bible: A Faithful Rendering or a Departure From Tradition?

For centuries, Christians have relied on various translations of scripture to deepen their understanding of God's Word. Among these, one version stands out for its approachability and accessibility: The Living Bible (TLB) by Ken Taylor. But what sets the TLB apart from other renderings like the King James Version (KJV)? In this article, we'll explore whether Catholics should consider using The Living Bible as their primary translation.

The History Behind The King James Version

Before diving into a comparison between the KJv and TLB, let's briefly examine the background of one of Christianity's most iconic translations: the King James Version. Authorized by King James I in 1611, this influential version was commissioned to create an authoritative English Bible that could be widely accepted across different denominations within the Church of England.

While its translation process involved a team effort from skilled scholars and theologians, it remains associated with one man above all others - William Tyndale. However, due credit must also go to John 'A' 'the author', who oversaw the final stages of production before publication in 1611 under King James's royal sanction.

Key Differences Between The KJV And TLB

So what are some key differences between these two influential versions that might impact a Catholic reader’s decision on which one is best for them?

Firstly, consider language style. While both use formal English throughout their text matter (though with distinct vocabulary preferences), there exists considerable variation when it comes to sentence structure and overall readability - something particularly noticeable if you're new comer looking at Bible readings without prior experience reading older forms of written communication.

Secondly, look into how specific passages are translated or interpreted. For instance, Matthew 27:49-50 in the KJV reads 'And 'the' soldiers, when they had crucified him, did cast lots upon his garment, to whomsoever it should fall on it might be said 'This man was one of us', and therefore let them not rend it but cast a lot for my raiment''. In contrast, the TLB renders this passage much more simply as 'The soldiers who had crucified him gambled with clothes by casting lots to see whose share they would get. The soldiers were following what the scripture said - 'Don't tear your clothing! Let them decide how to divide up my garments among themselves.''. This example highlights one of the main differences between these two versions: while both aim for accuracy, their approaches towards rendering difficult or sensitive passages can sometimes lead to quite different interpretations.

Ultimately, whether Catholics should use The Living Bible as opposed to other translations like the King James Version comes down personal preference. While there may be some stylistic and interpretive variations between them that could potentially influence an individual's choice depending upon their own reading preferences and theological leanings - such as a greater emphasis on literal fidelity in more conservative circles versus a more dynamic approach towards conveying timeless truths for broader audiences elsewhere within Christendom today; both versions remain faithful renderings of God’s inspired Word, worthy consideration by any serious Christian seeking deeper insight into His holy scriptures through prayerful study.

The living bible king james version